Porsche 993 Turbo · PicoGK · engine support system

Shape study · fit and mechanical behaviour unverified

Branches around a load path.
The isolator stays separate.

The titanium carrier study now has neighbouring concepts: a central bracket, two open mount cages and two flexible envelopes. Each has a distinct role. A metal cage cannot stand in for a working rubber mount.

Geometry study from

01 / The shapes

An open bracket and two mount cages

Central branching bracket and one open mount cage with a separate lobed isolator envelope.
Actual exported triangles, in an illustrative exploded arrangement. The image does not establish the installed positions or measured bolt locations.

The bracket branches from four collars into two curved trunks and a crown. The mount housing uses curved branches around an open receiving volume. A separate six-lobed envelope reserves space for the flexible element; its material, internal mechanism, stiffness and damping remain unknown.

PET referenceRoleStudy
993 115 021 53Turbo engine carrierExisting R9 study; kept separately
993 115 103 52Central bracketNew branching shape study
993 375 049 05 × 2Engine mountsOpen cages and separate isolator envelopes

Read the existing titanium carrier R9 study. Carrera and RS carriers remain separate variants.

02 / What is established

Geometry checked; interfaces still unknown

The three distinct meshes pass independent checks of closed edges, consistent orientation, positive volume and a single connected component, with source and export hashes retained. The scene uses millimetres. These checks do not establish fit, strength, fatigue or all possible self-intersections.

“Bionic” names the branching morphology. No structural solver has justified the material distribution, and no topology optimisation or mechanical improvement is claimed.

What comes next

  1. Measure the bracket, carrier and body interfaces independently.
  2. Define engine loads and the required isolation and damping behaviour.
  3. Check fasteners, contact, strength, modes and fatigue using qualified material data.
  4. Review manufacture and physical tests before releasing a functional part.