porschefanatics

Independent parts atlas sources attached

Search
Menu

Interior · 993-INT-DOOR-OPENER-LEVER-F0-0001

993 interior door opener lever, aluminium F0 concept

ConceptFunctional part

Independent concept of an integrated lever and clevis for studying a low-volume LPBF remanufacture. PorscheFanatics establishes the left and right PET part numbers; FVD publishes the envelope and mass of an aftermarket pair, but no interface geometry allows fitment.

Concept CAD rendering for 993-int-door-opener-lever-f0-0001.
Not a photograph, not a render of a manufactured part, not evidence of fit or function.
Concept CAD orthographic views for 993-int-door-opener-lever-f0-0001.
Front, side and top views of the same concept CAD. Dimensions describe the model; fit on the car remains unverified.

The design

Vehicle
Porsche 993, 1994–1998
Variants
993 door trim variants to confirm
Porsche part numbers
99355585100, 99355585200
Category
Interior door release
Geometry basis
Mixed
Preferred process
Laser powder-bed fusion (metal printing)
Other candidate processes
CNC machining
Material
AlSi10Mg, screening; OEM material and grade of the commercial product unknown
Material standard
ASTM F3318-18 to be contracted if the concept progresses

Known limits

  • Only the 108 x 45 x 27 mm envelope comes from the commercial product page; the plate, pockets, clevis and bores are F0 hypotheses.
  • The published mass of 0.18 kg concerns the complete commercial pair and does not validate the mass of the concept.
  • The 150 N and +60 K case is synthetic; no 993 load, direction, stop or temperature has been measured.
  • The nominal calculation ignores real contact, LPBF defects, pin clearance, preload, coating, corrosion and aging.
  • The CalculiX screen uses six synthetic cases and a Goodman comparison of coupons; it computes no part life.
  • The geometric slicing is neither an EOSPRINT job nor a melt-pool, distortion or recoater calculation.
  • The asset and the scene pass minimal USD validation and an ovphysx smoke test; the Content Agents, the full SimReady profile, OVRTX and the door assembly have not been run.
  • The STEP proves only a computable BREP within the envelope; it must be neither printed for fitment nor installed in a door.

Post-processing it would need

  • Support removal while keeping access to the pockets
  • Heat treatment qualified for the machine and orientation
  • Boring and finishing of the pivot after the clearance is defined
  • Machining of the mounting faces with a future machining allowance
  • Anodizing or powder coating after dimensional inspection

What a supplier would have to provide

  • Traceable powder, machine, parameters, orientation and lot
  • Witness coupon in the critical orientation of the lever
  • Dimensional inspection of the envelope, pivot, mounting faces and stops
  • CT or radiography of the clevis and penetrant testing after machining
  • Controlled roughness and radii in the grip areas
  • Instrumented static and cyclic tests before any fitment

Sources